Homeโ€บGlossaryโ€บCart Abandonment Rate

Cart Abandonment Rate

General

Shopping Cart Abandonment Rate

The percentage of shoppers who add items to an online cart but leave without completing purchase, averaging 68-72% globally across e-commerce.

Definition

Cart abandonment rate measures the percentage of shoppers who add items to an online cart but leave without completing the purchase. The global average sits around 68-72% across e-commerce, a surprisingly high figure that partly reflects normal shopping behavior, comparing prices, saving items for later, or calculating total cost including shipping, rather than indicating something is necessarily broken in the checkout process.

Reducing cart abandonment is a common focus area for e-commerce optimization, since even modest improvements can meaningfully increase revenue without needing to drive more traffic. Common culprits include unexpected costs revealed late in checkout, mandatory account creation, and overly complicated checkout flows.

Formula

Cart Abandonment Rate (%) = (Carts Created โˆ’ Completed Purchases) / Carts Created ร— 100

Worked Example

An online store sees 10,000 shopping carts created in a month, with 2,800 resulting in a completed purchase.

  • Abandoned carts: 10,000 โˆ’ 2,800 = 7,200
  • Cart abandonment rate: (7,200 / 10,000) ร— 100 = 72%

This sits right at the global average, suggesting the store's checkout experience is roughly in line with typical e-commerce benchmarks, though further diagnosis of specific abandonment points in the funnel could still reveal targeted improvement opportunities.

Key Things to Know

  • High abandonment rates are the norm, not necessarily a red flag. The 68-72% global average reflects widespread browsing and comparison-shopping behavior, not universally broken checkout experiences.
  • Unexpected costs at checkout are among the most common triggers. Shipping fees, taxes, or other charges revealed only at the final step frequently cause shoppers to abandon after seeing the total.
  • Recovery tactics can reclaim meaningful revenue. Retargeting ads and abandoned cart email sequences often recover a real percentage of otherwise lost sales without needing new traffic acquisition.
  • Mobile abandonment typically runs higher than desktop. Screen size, checkout complexity, and cross-device browsing habits all contribute to this common pattern.
  • Should be interpreted alongside conversion rate, not in isolation. Reducing abandonment through friction (like blocking easy checkout exit) can backfire on overall customer experience even if the raw metric improves.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the global average cart abandonment rate so high, 68-72%?
Many shoppers use carts to save items, compare prices, or calculate total cost including shipping before deciding, rather than committing to purchase immediately. High abandonment doesn't necessarily mean something is broken, it partly reflects normal browsing behavior.
What are the most common reasons for cart abandonment?
Unexpected costs at checkout (shipping, taxes, fees), a required account creation, a complicated checkout process, and simply comparison shopping without immediate purchase intent are among the most cited reasons across industry research.
How do businesses try to recover abandoned carts?
Retargeting ads, abandoned cart email sequences reminding shoppers of items left behind, and simplifying the checkout flow are common tactics, often recovering a meaningful percentage of otherwise lost sales.
Does cart abandonment rate vary significantly by device?
Yes, mobile abandonment rates are typically higher than desktop, often due to smaller screens, slower checkout flows, or shoppers browsing on mobile with intent to purchase later on desktop.
Is a lower cart abandonment rate always better for a business?
Generally yes, but it should be interpreted alongside conversion rate and overall revenue, a business could theoretically lower abandonment by making it harder to leave the checkout flow, which would hurt customer experience even as the metric improves.